Nov 17 2008
A Crying Shame - King Family Denies use of MLK Likeness on T-shirts
According to a recent blog post by Copywrite,Ink, The Martin Luther King Estate is threatening Cafepress with a lawsuit for shopkeepers using the likeness of MLK in their Obama I have a Dream T-shirts.
Here is an excerpt from Copywrite,Ink:
“In what can only be described as a panicked reaction to an Associated Press story (and perhaps a cease-and-desist letter), CafePress.com placed a hold on and/or removed all merchandise bearing the likeness of Martin Luther King, Jr.
The AP story, which appeared in hundreds of newspapers, reports how the family of Martin Luther King, Jr. is demanding proceeds from the sudden wave of T-shirts, posters and other merchandise depicting the civil rights leader alongside President-Elect Barack Obama (and not alongside Obama for that matter).
CafePress members weren’t notified with such a specific reason. Instead, CafePress simply sent a message with its prewritten policy rhetoric: “We recently learned that your CafePress.com account contains material which may not be in compliance with our policies.” Read the entire post
Here is what the API News Service has to say:
King family seeks to cash in on MLK-Obama items
ATLANTA (AP) — Zealous guardians of his words and his likeness, the family of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. is demanding a share of the proceeds from the sudden wave of T-shirts, posters and other merchandise depicting the civil rights leader alongside Barack Obama.
Isaac Newton Farris Jr., King’s nephew and head of the nonprofit King Center in Atlanta, said the estate is entitled to hundreds of thousands of dollars in licensing fees — maybe even millions.
“Some of this is probably putting food on people’s plates. We’re not trying to stop anybody from legitimately supporting themselves,” he said, “but we cannot allow our brand to be abused.”
But while Obama’s election as the first black president may be the fulfillment of King’s dream and could yield a big windfall for his estate, policing his image and actually collecting any fees could prove to be a legal nightmare because of the great proliferation of unauthorized King-Obama paraphernalia, much of it sold by street vendors.
King’s writings, likeness and voice are considered intellectual property, and almost any use — from graduate thesis papers to TV documentaries — are subject to approval by his estate, now administered by his surviving children, Martin Luther King III, Dexter King and the Rev. Bernice King. (Because Obama is an elected official, his words and image are in the public domain and can be used without permission.)
Farris said he expects to announce deals in the coming weeks to license some items featuring images of King and Obama, and may sell some in the King Center bookstore alongside recordings of his speeches, postcards, calendars, mugs bearing images of King, and other licensed merchandise, which nets the center about $800,000 annually.
The family is protective of how King is depicted, and Farris said any items that are inconsistent with his uncle’s message and image would not be approved.
Any proceeds from King-Obama merchandise would also go to the King Center, said Farris, a member of the estate management team that reviews intellectual property issues.
The family, which refuses to divulge details of its licensing deals, is also discussing how to go after violators.
King’s estate sued CBS over its sale of a video documentary that used excerpts of his 1963 “I Have a Dream” speech. An appeals court ruled in 1999 that the speech was covered by copyright and was not public domain, but the estate ultimately settled out of court for an undisclosed sum.
“They are probably one of the most careful, concerned and on-top-of-it groups of image protectors I’ve ever met,” said Philippa Loengard, assistant director of the Kernochan Center for Law, Media and the Arts at Columbia University.
Realizing the value of his ideas, King himself copyrighted several of his speeches during his lifetime. After he died, that duty fell to his widow, Coretta, and, since her death in 2006, to their children. Some scholars have complained about the family’s aggressive pursuit of moneymaking opportunities.
But the Kings have never faced a challenge quite as big as this. Vendors across the country have capitalized on connecting Obama to King, mostly without permission and without a penny of the proceeds going to his estate.
“We realize the historic nature of events surrounding President-elect Obama and we are seeking an elegant solution to address the commercial use of Dr. King’s image in connection with our newly elected president,” Dexter King said in a statement.
With the siblings already battling in court over whether to publish their mother’s diaries, it could be difficult for them to reach a consensus.
Jock Smith, an attorney for Bernice King and Martin Luther King III, warned that any action Dexter King takes without their approval would be “an illegal action not sanctioned by the corporation.”
Obama accepted the Democratic nomination for president on the 45th anniversary of King’s “I Have a Dream” speech, and the nation’s first black president will be inaugurated on Jan. 20, the day after the federal holiday created to honor King.
In the past, the King estate has relied on concerned citizens to blow the whistle on vendors and manufacturers, who then get a cease-and-desist letter. If that fails, the estate sues.
“If you make a dollar, we should make a dime,” Farris said. “That’s not happening now.”
Street vendors and cousins Francis Sarr and Michael Silva said they are not sure whether anyone licensed the T-shirts for sale at their downtown Atlanta souvenir stand, including one featuring images of King and Obama and the words, “I HAVE A DREAM … THAT CHANGE IS GONNA COME.”
But they said they would be happy to contribute a portion of the proceeds to the King estate.
“By right, they definitely deserve something from it and should give their consent to sell it,” Silva said. “I guess everyone is trying to cash in.”
Now that I have said this - I remember seeing MLK in San Francisco and with the recent election, I am absolutely elated, so I dearly placed his (PUBLIC DOMAIN from the Liberary of Congress) image and rememberances on my t-shirts which have now been removed. It’s a pity that the family is being so ridiculous in this matter - you would THINK they would be honored and delighted, Instead they are being absolute shameful money mongers in this matter. Lord knows they don’t already have enough bucks- All I wanted to do was keep my electric paid. Pity a Real Pity, I am SURE MLK woudl roll over in his grave if he knew how they were acting on this year of such a milestone in his dream come true. tsk tsk.
More News Stories on this topic:
New York Times says it BEST “This is the King estate piggybacking on the success of Obama,” said David J. Garrow, a Pulitzer Prize-winning biographer of Dr. King. “The family says they don’t want their brand tarnished, but they seem blind to how much reputational damage they’re doing.”
but you can get all of these designs on t-shirts, cups and mugs, stickers, buttons, hoodies, clocks, throw pillows, aprons, and even kids and dog tees. If you have a cool Anti GOP shop or design, reply to this post and let us know- we are continuing our search for cool ANTI GOP gear from Cafepress.
Republican National Committee, which has threatened to sue CafePress.com